Filtered to one company
One Briefing covering the jurisdictions, data types, sectors, and AI features indicated by a subscriber's Company Profile — not a broadcast written for every privacy professional in America.
The regulatory changes that affect your company. Every week. With the source attached.
A weekly Briefing of privacy and AI-governance changes, filtered to the jurisdictions, data types, and product features a company actually has. We report the change and link the operative text. What it means for one company is that company's own call — that is the subscriber's job, and we are not going to pretend otherwise.
Specimen issue. Ashlar Health, Inc. is a fictional company. This is a sample of what Lintel Vantage produces, covering the historical week of 11–17 May 2026. The regulatory events it reports are real, dated, and primary-sourced; the company they are filtered to is not.
Read the sample before you read our claims about it.
This is issue No. 1 for a fictional 200-person health-adjacent software company — a complete Briefing, not an excerpt and not a mockup. Every item carries its operative source. Nothing is gated; there is no email wall.
- Read the full sample Briefing (PDF, 7 pages)
- Read it in the browser instead
- See the quarterly Baseline (PDF)
The Baseline is the state of the record — which regimes touch a company and where each one stands. The Briefing is the transitions — what moved in the past week. Same registry, two renderings.
What the Briefing is
The source is attached
Every item carries the operative primary source — the statute, the rule, the docket, the release. Nothing asks to be taken on faith, because nothing has to be.
We report; you decide
We describe what changed and the conditions that trigger it in the general case. We never state what it means for a particular company. That judgment stays with the professional who owns it.
Two claims we deliberately do not make: that we catch everything, and that we save time. The first is unfalsifiable and bounded coverage is published instead —What We Monitor states the sources and, as prominently, the exclusions. The second is every vendor's favourite claim, and this reader has heard it.
What else you could use
The free layer
The IAPP Daily Dashboard and the law-firm alert stack are genuinely good, and we say so. Their structural weakness is that they are broadcast: written for every privacy professional in the country, which means most of every issue is about someone else's company. We report the same regulatory record, filtered to one company, with the source attached. We are not claiming to know things they do not. We are claiming to know which of those things are yours.
Enterprise regulatory platforms
OneTrust DataGuidance, Regology, Corlytics and Compliance.ai are the ceiling, not the competitor — sales-led, built for a company that has a privacy department, and priced for one. We are not them, and the price says so plainly.
Generic page monitors
Visualping and Fluxguard detect that a page changed. They cannot report which regulation changed, in which jurisdiction, under what trigger — because they do not model what a cure period or an applicability threshold is. A diff of rendered HTML is not a diff of the law.
A frontier chat model
A chat model is pull: it answers the questions you thought to ask. A subscriber who already knew what to ask would not need this. Coverage of a defined source set on a fixed cadence is a property of a system, not a capability of a model, and it does not arrive with the next release.
Questions worth asking first
- I already get this free from the IAPP and three law firms.
- You do, and they are good. They are also written for everyone. We send the same regulatory record filtered to one company's jurisdictions, data types, and product, with the source attached. If a free stack already reports which state regimes moved under one company's specific thresholds last week, that stack is enough.
- Is this AI-generated?
- Collection and summarisation are automated. That is exactly why the operative source is printed next to every item — no summary here needs to be taken on faith, and it should not be. We do not interpret, we do not advise, and we publish aCorrections Log. The full pipeline, including the two machine checks and the human one, is on the Methodology page.
- So who reviews it? What are the credentials?
- None that would matter, and that is the point. This is not a law firm and it renders no opinion — so there is no opinion to be qualified to give. We report what changed and hand over the text. The CIPP/US belongs to the reader.
- How do I know you will not miss something?
- By reading what we monitor, because we publish it source by source, with the exclusions stated as loudly as the coverage. Anyone claiming to catch everything is either mistaken or has not tried. See What We Monitor.
- Is this just a page monitor?
- A page monitor reports that a page changed. It cannot report that Connecticut dropped an applicability threshold, or that a cure period has been eliminated, because it does not model what those are.
- Why not just ask a chat model?
- Because you would have to know what to ask. A chat model answers questions; it does not report which state regime moved last Tuesday while you were doing your actual job.
- Will you still be here in a year?
- Lintel Standard is an incorporated US-facing entity, carries errors & omissions and media liability cover, caps liability and disclaims warranties in writing in itsTerms, and offers a 30-day money-back guarantee. If we vanish, a subscriber is out one month.
- Why is there no free trial?
- There is a free sample — a complete Briefing for a named fictional company, above, so the product is visible in full before any payment. And thirty days to change your mind after.
- $249 seems cheap for regulatory work.
- It is cheap, because we do the cheap part. Finding, filtering, and sourcing changes is mechanical and we do it well. Deciding what they mean for one company is the expensive part, and that is not what is being sold here — that is what the reader is for.
Price
One tier. No sales call, no demo, no seat maths.
$249per monthSubscribe monthly
$2,499per year · about 17% below monthlySubscribe annually
Thirty-day money-back guarantee. Refunds are honoured on an emailed request inside thirty days, without argument. Cancellation is self-serve through the Stripe customer portal at any time.
The sample above is the free tier. There is no trial, because the sample already shows the product in full, and the guarantee covers the rest.
What arrives: a Baseline within the first week, then a Briefing every week on a fixed, published schedule, plus out-of-band Alerts for effective-date arrivals and for enforcement in a subscriber's matched conditions. Delivery is by email — there is no dashboard and no login. Coverage as it stands today: 20 comprehensive state privacy laws in effect as of 2026-07-13 (counting laws enforceable statewide; 19 excluding narrower-scope statutes such as Florida's). Computed from the registry. A further 4 are enacted and not yet effective.